When I Fall in Love

There is no one-size-fits-all definition of love. Some of us would say that love is all about sacrifice; some would contend that the same is all about being happy; and some would argue that these are just an illusion or chemical reactions created by our brain. We cannot see love, touch it, nor smell it yet we are so dedicated to invest for it—some would even die for it. But the quest to decipher what love really is still remains a mystery. At this moment in time, I still ask myself whether or not I should fall in love for false love has already been abound in this world. In this essay I will discuss my insights about love and how I would anticipate falling in love (eros) as a college student.

Is not it funny how we become unreasonable when we fall in love? For instance, the most absurd, cringey, or stupid things, we shall do, in the name of love. Most of us love the chance of falling in love, albeit falling out of love can be emotionally lethal. The point is we struggle and gamble for love despite its slim chance to prosper. Abysmally, our happiness becomes dependent to other person since we devote our life waiting for the right person to come. No one knows when we will fall in love, but if that time comes I will promise to love myself first. I shall not make any decision out of surging emotions. I should learn to be happy even if I am alone, for whenever the time comes that someone will love me, there will be no more hole to fill in my heart since it has already been filled with self-love. Most importantly, if she leaves, pain will be compromised since my happiness is not dependent to other person. Rightly so, I choose to love myself more. Ultimately, engaging a romantic affair is a prelude to marriage, and those who do not agree with me do not truly love at all. We do not love someone because we need happiness, sex, nor attention among others—-because those are nothing but mere lust; the truth is we love because of unknown reasons, this phenomenon is but truly serendipity. It is true that love has the reason which reason has not, but as long as we are still sober, we must never lose grope towards our essential objectives in life. True power resides when we become objective in our lifelong decisions. Never settle for temporary love, restrain yourself and be prudent. Despite the overflowing adversarial aftermaths of it, keep in mind that its end would always be worthwhile. Make love when it is the right time. Be in love when fate knocks on your door with red roses. Just never compromise your dreams because of selfish erotic love—that makes love detrimental than remedial.
It is imperative to remember that falling in love is not a choice, those who defy fate and forcibly pursue love would likely end up miserably. Thus falling in love is by chance. On the other hand, staying in love requires work since no one falls out of love by chance—to save your relationship, you have to work for it otherwise it will eventually collapse like a poorly-built infrastructure. Ultimately, no one falls out of love by chance, it is by choice. Through the depth of every relationship, everything superficial gradually decays—-in order to keep the spur of affection, fortitude and commitment are essential. In this world of make believe, once must be rational.

Love is not something we must take for granted, since it is a gift or privilege. Bear with the peer-pressure, libido, and infatuations—-these are just superficial concepts of love. Just let everything be and wait, fate will take its course.

On Faith, Reason, and Truth

The quest for an enlightened truth about the mystery of God, the world, and the universe has plagued the human civilization since time immemorial. In pursuit thereof, some prominent political philosophers in medieval times, like St. Thomas Aquinas, attempted to fuse faith and reason to explain them. However, a careful perusal of his book “Summa Theologica” would reveal a lot of unanswered questions about life’s mystery. This essay will explain and refute St. Thomas Aquinas’ theological and philosophical assumptions in relation to what had transpired in some biblical narratives in the annals of time.
Science finds most of the religious scriptures such as the Bible to be faulty and inconsistent. Some stories in the bible including the Creation of Universe, Adam and Eve & The Great Flood are the most illogical stories to be written on the Bible. Creationists believe that the Universe has come into existence because of God. God’s creation of the earth is found in the book of Genesis and consists of the following seven days of creation: God made light the atmosphere on the first day; dry ground and plants on the second and the third day; sun, moon and stars on the fourth day; birds and sea animals on the fifth day; land animals and human beings on the sixth day; and the Sabbath of rest on the seventh day.
God, as defined by the Christians, is an omnipotent and omniscient God. He possesses boundless prowess and intellect. Premised on the definition, it can be argued that the God defined by the Christians is not powerful because it took Him seven days to create everything when He could have created everything in a day. Noteworthy to point out also why the God, as perceived by the Christians, is not powerful because He rested on the seventh day. It is, therefore, absurd to ponder on that an omnipotent entity could get physically exhausted. Because of this, the belief in a powerful God has been tainted with doubt. As a result, atheism was born.
Doubt also prompted the people throughout the years to inquire into the veracity of the Great Flood in the Bible. In fact, the Great Flood was one of the most debated stories in the Bible. The Bible narrated that God saw how great wickedness had become, which provoked God to wipe humankind off the face of the earth. But one righteous man, among all the people of that time, Noah, found favor in God’s eyes. To secure salvation, God told Noah to build an ark for him and his family in preparation for a catastrophic flood that would destroy every living thing on earth. God also instructed Noah to bring into the ark two of all living creatures, both male and female, and seven pairs of all the clean animals, along with every kind of food to be stored for the animals and his family while on the ark. Noah obeyed everything God commanded him to do.
After Noah and his family had entered the ark, rain fell for a period of forty days and nights. The waters flooded the earth for a hundred and fifty days, and every living thing was destroyed. As the waters receded, the ark came to rest on the mountains of Ararat. Noah and his family continued to wait for almost eight more months while the surface of the earth dried out. Finally, after an entire year, God invited Noah to come out of the ark. Immediately, Noah built an altar and offered burnt sacrifices with some of the clean animals to give thanks to God for deliverance. God was pleased with the offerings and promised never again to destroy all the living creatures as he had just done. Later God established a covenant with Noah: “Never again will there be a flood to destroy the earth.” As a sign of this everlasting covenant, God set a rainbow in the clouds.
Later in time after the Great Flood, several inquiries were raised to shed light or cast doubt on the truthfulness of the narrative. Guided by faith and reason, St. Thomas Aquinas defended the narrative through his propositions in Summa Theologica. First, St. Thomas Aquinas explained the proof of Motion. According to him, everything is undergoing motion. Since nothing can be at once in both actuality and potentiality, it is therefore necessary to arrive at a first mover, put into motion by no other; this primary mover is God. Second, he discussed the proof of Efficient Causes. We perceive a series of efficient cause of things in the world. He stated that nothing exists prior to itself. Thus, it is necessary to admit a first efficient cause, which we refer to as God. Third, he explained the proof of Contingency. We find in nature things that are possible to be and not to be, that come into being and go out of being. Some being exists of its own necessity, and does not receive its existence from one another being, but rather causes them. This all men speak of as God. Fourth, the proof from Gradation of being; there is a gradation to be found in things: some are better or worse than others. Hence, there must also be something which is to all beings the cause of their being, goodness, and every other perfection; and this we call God. Fifth, the proof of Design; we see that natural bodies work toward some goal, and do not do so by chance. Most natural things lack knowledge. Therefore some intelligent being exists which designed by a supreme being called God.
Contrary to the postulated ways of St. Thomas, the succeeding points argue the falsity of his logic on God’s existence. The omnipotent God allowed the Great Flood to happen to cleanse evil; however, the absurdity of the apocryphal tale makes us question more the veracity of the great flood. A God, based on the prior definition, could have just let evil men vanish on a split-second, but it seems there have been discrepancies on the scriptures. No matter how extreme the rain would get, it cannot flood and cover up the entire land since the water would just end up flowing through the seas. In order to completely cover up the entire surface of the land on earth and ocean with rainwater – including Mt. Everest (which is about 28,000 ft. high) it would roughly need to have 4,525,000,000,000 cubic kilometers of rainwater (approximation) excluding the sea water. This is impossible because the waters on the sea only measures to 1,386,000,000,000 cubic kilometers. Moreover, the longest streak of rain in the history was recorded in Hawaii lasting for 247 days but it didn’t flood the entire globe after the rain.
There are roughly 1,200,000 species of animals that have been catalogued (many more haven’t been yet). If 42,981 cubic meters would be divided to 2.4 million, each animal would have a living space of 26x26x26 cm excluding the quarters of humans. As such, in this three-story Ark, there would no longer have enough space for food and provisions. In addition, carnivores aboard don’t have any source of food. They have been inside for a year without refrigerators; even if they had had preserved meat provisions, there are 2,000,000 species of insects inside the ship, hence, making carnivores impossible to survive inside the ship for a year. Supposing all of the carnivores have survived inside the ship, they won’t still have meat to consume thereafter.
Countless arguments are raised regarding the loopholes of the bible. It is no wonder why there has been a clout for agnosticism and atheism by some ardent scientists and evolutionists. They argue the accuracy of the writings on the Bible and the history of religion depicts the grimmest truths in the course of human civilization. It has been written by several authors and truth revisionists for the purpose of widening their powers and land. Despite the existence of thousands of gods, we must be vigilant to seek enlightenment. Never settle for what has been indoctrinated upon us. Let us be skeptical and radical to strengthen our beliefs.
In this world, there are only two kinds of God, the one who created everything—and the god we created.” Concoction of faith and reason was the highlight of Scholasticism. It brought reason at par with faith. It became easy of the later thinkers to drop faith in favor of reason in their thinking towards a secular and egalitarian society and state. Given that we are already on the verge of reaching the pinnacle of human intellect, let us use this gift as an instrument to arrive at enlightenment and truth so that we can liberate ourselves from ignorance.

Is the concoction of science and faith a forever myth?

Introduce Yourself (Example Post)

This is an example post, originally published as part of Blogging University. Enroll in one of our ten programs, and start your blog right.

You’re going to publish a post today. Don’t worry about how your blog looks. Don’t worry if you haven’t given it a name yet, or you’re feeling overwhelmed. Just click the “New Post” button, and tell us why you’re here.

Why do this?

  • Because it gives new readers context. What are you about? Why should they read your blog?
  • Because it will help you focus you own ideas about your blog and what you’d like to do with it.

The post can be short or long, a personal intro to your life or a bloggy mission statement, a manifesto for the future or a simple outline of your the types of things you hope to publish.

To help you get started, here are a few questions:

  • Why are you blogging publicly, rather than keeping a personal journal?
  • What topics do you think you’ll write about?
  • Who would you love to connect with via your blog?
  • If you blog successfully throughout the next year, what would you hope to have accomplished?

You’re not locked into any of this; one of the wonderful things about blogs is how they constantly evolve as we learn, grow, and interact with one another — but it’s good to know where and why you started, and articulating your goals may just give you a few other post ideas.

Can’t think how to get started? Just write the first thing that pops into your head. Anne Lamott, author of a book on writing we love, says that you need to give yourself permission to write a “crappy first draft”. Anne makes a great point — just start writing, and worry about editing it later.

When you’re ready to publish, give your post three to five tags that describe your blog’s focus — writing, photography, fiction, parenting, food, cars, movies, sports, whatever. These tags will help others who care about your topics find you in the Reader. Make sure one of the tags is “zerotohero,” so other new bloggers can find you, too.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started